Crowd-Sourced Peer Review: Substitute or supplement for the current outdated system?

Harnad, Stevan (2014). « Crowd-Sourced Peer Review: Substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? ». LSE Impact Blog, 8(21).

Fichier(s) associé(s) à ce document :

	HTML Télécharger (258kB)

Résumé

The problem with peer review today is that there is so much research being produced that there are not enough experts with enough time to peer-review it all. As we look to address this problem, issues of standards and hierarchy remain unsolved. Stevan Harnad wonders whether crowd-sourced peer review could match, exceed, or come close to the benchmark of the current system. He predicts crowdsourcing will indeed be able to provide a supplement to the classical system, hopefully improving efficiency and accuracy, but not a substitute for it.

Type:	Article de revue scientifique
Mots-clés ou Sujets:	Open access, institutional repository, mandate, publishing
Unité d'appartenance:	Faculté des sciences humaines > Département de psychologie
Déposé par:	Stevan Harnad
Date de dépôt:	26 nov. 2014 13:59
Dernière modification:	26 nov. 2014 13:59
Adresse URL :	http://archipel.uqam.ca/id/eprint/6319

Modifier les métadonnées (propriétaire du document)

Statistiques