Harnad, Stevan (2014). « Crowd-Sourced Peer Review: Substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? ». LSE Impact Blog, 8(21).
Fichier(s) associé(s) à ce document :![]() |
HTML
Télécharger (258kB) |
---|
Résumé
The problem with peer review today is that there is so much research being produced that there are not enough experts with enough time to peer-review it all. As we look to address this problem, issues of standards and hierarchy remain unsolved. Stevan Harnad wonders whether crowd-sourced peer review could match, exceed, or come close to the benchmark of the current system. He predicts crowdsourcing will indeed be able to provide a supplement to the classical system, hopefully improving efficiency and accuracy, but not a substitute for it.
Type: | Article de revue scientifique |
---|---|
Mots-clés ou Sujets: | Open access, institutional repository, mandate, publishing |
Unité d'appartenance: | Faculté des sciences humaines > Département de psychologie |
Déposé par: | Stevan Harnad |
Date de dépôt: | 26 nov. 2014 13:59 |
Dernière modification: | 26 nov. 2014 13:59 |
Adresse URL : | http://archipel.uqam.ca/id/eprint/6319 |
Modifier les métadonnées (propriétaire du document) |
Statistiques |