Harnad, Stevan (1993). « Computation Is Just Interpretable Symbol Manipulation: Cognition Isn't ». Minds and Machines, 4, pp. 379-390.
Fichier(s) associé(s) à ce document :
HTML
Télécharger (39kB) |
Résumé
Computation is interpretable symbol manipulation. Symbols are objects that are manipulated on the basis of rules operating only on the symbols' shapes , which are arbitrary in relation to what they can be interpreted as meaning. Even if one accepts the Church/Turing Thesis that computation is unique, universal and very near omnipotent, not everything is a computer, because not everything can be given a systematic interpretation; and certainly everything can't be given every systematic interpretation. But even after computers and computation have been successfully distinguished from other kinds of things, mental states will not just be the implementations of the right symbol systems, because of the symbol grounding problem: The interpretation of a symbol system is not intrinsic to the system; it is projected onto it by the interpreter. This is not true of our thoughts. We must accordingly be more than just computers. My guess is that the meanings of our symbols are grounded in the substrate of our robotic capacity to interact with that real world of objects, events and states of affairs that our symbols are systematically interpretable as being about.
Type: | Article de revue scientifique |
---|---|
Mots-clés ou Sujets: | catégorisation, computation, apprentissage, langage, ancrage symbolique, évolution, intelligence artificielle, cognition, réseaux neuronaux, perception categorielle, Searle, Turing, sciences cognitives |
Unité d'appartenance: | Faculté des sciences humaines > Département de psychologie Instituts > Institut des sciences cognitives (ISC) |
Déposé par: | Stevan Harnad |
Date de dépôt: | 24 sept. 2007 |
Dernière modification: | 20 avr. 2009 14:27 |
Adresse URL : | http://archipel.uqam.ca/id/eprint/148 |
Modifier les métadonnées (propriétaire du document) |
Statistiques |